Saturday, December 11, 2010
Wednesday, October 27, 2010
Monday, October 18, 2010
1. Cloud Computing – Nothing new here. Cloudsource what’s not a competitive advantage for you.
Wednesday, October 13, 2010
There is no magic sauce when working to fix an organization or department. Often I'm accused of over simplifying the process when doing an evaluation but it's often when looking at problem in simple terms where the solution becomes apparent. The first mistake organizations make when making improvements is to realize that fixes cannot occur with a top down or bottoms up approach. Rather it needs to incorporate both approaches. The top down approach will define the organizational strategy which must always be the top consideration. Conversely the bottom up approach will allow those who are in the trenches to correctly identify the problems and offer suggestions for resolution. Where their complications arise is in making sure the bottoms up recommendations are fully in support of the top down strategy.
The Top down approach can only be successful if integrating the IT team into the upfront, top-down business planning processes of the organization. Additionally for both approaches Strategy is viewed as a "theoretical activity" rather than an operational planning process. Strategy can only be made real if it is directly linked to how the organization will make day-to-day investment and prioritization processes. Strategy is not something that can be done once and then executed over a multi-year period. Strategy needs to take the long-term view, with the recognition that annual events will require the business and IT to make adjustments to new market conditions or accepted events. It must be continually tested and validated over the planning period. Many CIOs have difficulty in getting business input to their IT strategy initiatives because the business doesn't have a clearly articulated business strategy or because the CIO doesn't know how to plan for, and respond to, multiple business requirements from multiple shared-service business customers.
My approach to accommodating and improving this process is to create a mind map with the organizational leaders as well as the day to day heroes. Using the mind map we will discuss which components of the map support the organizational strategy and which don't. After determining the components which are useful and which aren't we will then value stream the problem components and dive in to problem activities which aren't value added. Anything which is something the customer is not willing to pay for cannot be considered value added. After determining the Value added/Non-Value added ratio we will go to work to fix the problems. The above defined process is very high level but is an easy intro in to how to address organizational problems while empowering your employees to own and fix the issues.
Thursday, October 7, 2010
Wednesday, October 6, 2010
- Traditional – IT kept the lights on.
- Future- IT invents and innovates products to grow the business.
- Traditional – IT is a cost center which utilizes Total Cost of Ownership in evaluating projects.
- Future – IT is a profit center which utilizes ROI to measure the value of investments.
- Traditional – IT took requests thrown over the wall and found technologies or developed tools to accommodate.
- Future – IT is engaged in marketing and new product development so far upstream that they have input on strategic decisions.
- Traditional – IT did projects.
- Future – IT engages in services which enables products.
Wednesday, September 29, 2010
What Makes Your Product Valuable? Journey on the Value Stream - Part 3 on Organizational ImprovementIn our previous discussions I introduced concepts around how to start organizational change from a com...
Let me first define what this post isn't. This post is not arguing that you should not lean up through automation (Although Deming wou...
Large and small corporations, both in high-tech and traditional industries, now owe most of their value to inves...
I n my previous blog post Waste Is Everywhere and It Starts With You I discussed that constructing enterprise transformations are dif...
Have you ever heard someone say "Well we need to change the culture to fix that?" All to often when an organization is beginning...
Part four of this blog series on initiating change in the organization through Future State Mind Mapping and the e...
The proliferation of process methodologies has not only made the traditional form of managing more uncertain, but has greatly increase...
Arguable one of the greatest wastes in corporations past and present is the gross underutilization of people’s talents skills and knowled...
Even though few would dispute the value of being an engaged leader, many still do not practice what they preach. The harsh reality is great...
When Edward Deming, the Grandfather of Quality, taught his methods to the Japanese in the 1950's, he was working with a group that had...